The Annual Delegate Conference was held on the 1st and 2nd of February.
The theme of Conference this year was “Ensuring Safety Through Change”.
Decisions of the conference are detailed in the attached document
Air Traffic Systems Specialist (ATSS) Branch, National
The Annual Delegate Conference was held on the 1st and 2nd of February.
The theme of Conference this year was “Ensuring Safety Through Change”.
Decisions of the conference are detailed in the attached document
Sorry you have no rights to view this post!
Sorry you have no rights to view this post!
Sorry you have no rights to view this post!
Sorry you have no rights to view this post!
Sorry you have no rights to view this post!
Please see below for dates, times and venues
CTC
10th Jan 2020 1200-1330
Room B1-16
13th Jan 2020 1200-1300 Room B1-06
15th Jan 2020 1500-1600 Room B0-03
16th Jan 2020 1500-1600 Room B0-03
17th Jan 2020 1000-1130 Room B1-11 (TU room)
Swanwick
8/01/2020 1300-1430 Swanwick M1
14/01/2020 1130-1300 Swanwick M1
20/01/2020 1030-1200 Swanwick Presentation Room
Prestwick
Thursday 16th Jan – 1330 to 1500
Thursday 23rd Jan – 1330 to 1500
Tuesday 28th Jan – 1330 to 1500
Sorry you have no rights to view this post!
As many of you will have seen from the recent HUB article, NATS has not accepted the CAA’s proposed National Performance Plan for RP3 (2020 – 2024).
This means that NATS (NERL) felt it could not comply with the requirements of the RP3 plan as set out in the CAA’s decision document, given the levels of funding that the CAA had allowed for. It is now expected that the CAA will refer the matter to the Competitions and Markets Authority (CMA) for review.
This is significant as it is the first time since privatisation that NATS have rejected the proposed plan.
We have been fully involved in the whole process to date, meeting with both NATS and the CAA economic regulation team over the last year, as well as providing formal consultation responses. Prospect is fully supportive of original NATS plan, which provided for increased resource, as well as much needed technology upgrades and airspace modernisation.
The CAA’s plan suggested stringent targets, that when coupled with a reduction in the required funding to achieve all of the plans aims, would leave NATS in a very difficult position. There simply would not be adequate resources which potentially jeopardises both operational service delivery and projects including much needed airspace change and would negatively impact the business as a whole.
We fully support NATS’ approach in rejecting the plan and will be continuing our work to aid NATS in achieving the best settlement possible.